Sunday, April 26, 2009

Theology: Is God HE?



Re-imagining God in The Shack

Recently, Gender Blog posted a review of the popular book, The Shack by professor and author Mary Kassian (The Feminist Mistake). If you're among the "un-Shacked evangelical minority" (like me) here's the story in a nutshell. I deeply respect professor Kassian and the counter-cultural position she takes in defense of biblical femininity. She certainly doesn't mince words when it comes to her opinions. Listen to what she has to say about how God is presented in The Shack.

The Shack contains terribly wrong concepts about God. Plain and simple... I've had good friends tell me that I'm missing the point of the Shack. Maybe I am. But maybe, just maybe, they are. Maybe they are getting caught up in the emotion of a heart-wrenching story and are failing to notice the horrendous theology that under girds it. The authors claim that 'at its core the book is one long Bible Study.' This isn't an ordinary story book. It's a book that seeks to transform people's ideas about God. The fiction is merely a vehicle for the theology.

How we image God matters. So the image of God the book presents matters. It matters a great deal. I seem to recall that God wasn't terribly amused when his people imaged him in the wrong way, as a golden calf. If you're not convinced that we should refrain from imaging God as female, and are interested in understanding more about the feminist theology rampant in the Shack, check into my book, The Feminist Mistake. If you take the time to understand the impact that feminism has had on society and church, then maybe you'll understand my distase for the Shack's feminine god rendition.


The nearly universal frothing of the Christian community over the Shack shows me how very much the philosophy of feminism has influenced even the Evangelical church.

When it comes down to it, my primary interest is not to engage in a debate about the merits of the Shack. It's OK if you liked the book. There are some good messages in it, and parts that I liked very much. And it's apparently helped people in some significant ways. So that's the good part. But I do want you to think about the false gender-blended image of God this book insidiously presents. And I do want you to base your thinking about God and masculinity and femininity on Scripture, and not on the spirit of this age. The thing that bothers me the most about the Shack is that it wraps destructive ideas up in an appealing package and feeds it to people who have neither the discernment nor the desire to carefully separate truth from error. Most Shackites don't have a clue about the magnitude of the implications of messing with Trinitarian imagery.

Here's the thing. In the Old Testament, God instructed his people to reject female goddess images and images of God as a bi-sexual or a dual-sexual Baal/Ashtoreth-type collaboration. God hated this imagery so much that he had his people destroy it and all those who promoted it. The New Testament Church also fought hard against teachings that sought to incorporate female images of God alongside the male images - the Gnostic heresy, in particular. And now, it seems that the same ideas are knocking once again.... and many are throwing the Church doors wide open and welcoming them in.

What's the big deal? Why can't we image God as female? The main reason is that God defines who God is and how we are to image him and relate to him. God has chosen to reveal himself with male imagery. Father is HE. Son is HE. Holy Spirit is HE. That's not to say that God is male. He encompasses everything that is good about masculinity and femininity. But that doesn't mean that we have the liberty to think or refer to him as female. That's crossing a line we have no right to cross.

The gender imagery that God has given us is highly important. It reflects critical truths about the nature of the Trinity. Calling him "she" violates his character and important imagery about the nature of our relationship to him...

There's a whole lot more to be said about the importance of accurate gender imagery and the importance of honoring and preserving masculine imagery for God. But I'll leave it at that for now. Hopefully this post has alerted you to some popular false ways of thinking that are both insidious and dangerous. The nearly universal frothing of the Christian community over the Shack shows me how very much the philosophy of feminism has influenced even the Evangelical church.


Your raves, rants, and reactions?


Photo: mllerustad (Flickr)

17 Comments:

Faith said...

I didn't really have a problem with the novel as I kept reminding my self it is FICTION! and not really great fiction for that matter. I also like that it appeals to seekers and nonbelievers as right now there seems to be alot of books that are "fantasy" oriented and so, at least in my opinion, the author does a fairly good job with the whole fantasy thing yet getting some Spiritual truths in there. God is all things to all people sometimes. if a person needs to view God as a Mother due to issues from their past/with their own mother (or no mother) and I've met people like that, then I don't see the problem. BUT....I do not think changing the Scriptures to read/say He/She is acceptable either. My point: the book is just "ok" fiction/fantasy. not really well written compared to other novels on the bestseller list. The theme of the book is what is important.

a woman found said...

I really enjoyed the Shack, mostly for its message of God's soveriegnty and extravagant love. But I agree with this author about blurring the line of God imaging Himself as a He.

I take great joy in seeing the feminine characteristics of God... it reminds me that I too am made in His image and that my calling is not "less" because I'm female. If it's "less" or "weak" its because Christ (in whom my life, even my femaleness exsists) humbled Himself and became obedient to death.

God is "I Am that I Am..." He is the Gate of the Sheep. He is the Lamb. He is the King of kings. And He became a worm and not a man on the cross (Psalm 22:6). Nevertheless, God is GOD and HE chose to reveal Himself as HE.

Though His character is multifacited and His name is full of many descriptions, I don't want to "remove the ancient landmarks." (Proverbs 22:28)

I guess what I'm saying is I agree with this author that the blurring of the lines in regards to what image God reveals Himself in is dangerous. Yet within the "HE" who God is, is all which God is... which is not limited to maleness.

"For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory of man. For man is not from woman, but woman from man... Nevertheless, neither is man independent of woman, nor woman independent of man, in the Lord. For as woman came from man, even so man also comes through woman; but all things are from God." - 1 Cor. 11:7-9,11-12

The "I AM" revealed Himself as a HE. But within the HE is all of the "I AM". He is known only through Christ, who is not a woman, but a man. Yet in Christ is man and woman.

If someone based their theology on the Shack they could be very misguided. Of course, if someone based their theology on Hinds Feet in High Places (one of my all time favorite books) I think they could be very misguided too. The knowledge of the Holy One (Jesus) is understanding (Proverbs 9:10).

From Him I can find what reflects His glory in the Shack, in Hinds Feet, in many publications and actions... but I never lean on any of them for understanding God... I lean only on Jesus.

Thanks for the thought provoking post... I like thinking :)

A Stone Gatherer said...

I loved this post! I've read the book and was uncomfortable with the imagery. Others tried to "help" me see that it was important for this man to see God as a woman and not a man. I love home she brought us back to scripture and how God discribes himself. I am going to post the link on my facebook. Thanks for sharing this article.

Jennifer said...

What an excellant review. I didn't finish reading the book becuase I was getting to worked up/frustrated at the false theology in it. I had so many people tell me that "it is just fiction". Nope, I don't agree. I think it is dangerous for the very reasons stated in this review. My daughter (15) wants to read it and I told her she may not. When she is older she can decide on her own whether or not it is worth her time but for now I don't want her reading false beliefs and not knowing what is right and what is wrong.
Thank you for sharing this!

crickl's nest said...

I think theology IS important, even in fiction. Stories, characters and worldviews get into your head.

Our modern day Christian culture needs to always always always keep the Bible as their main reading material, then we can better determine where an author is coming from. That book has gotten into a lot of people's heads nowadays and it is doing a work...a divisive one in churches, etc.

Thanks for the review. I really like Mary Kassian. She is very balanced, thoughtful and Biblically based, instead of culturally based. I hope that makes sense. There are a lot of these kinds of books out today trying to redefine how to relate to or view God. Careful study of God's true character and the way He's revealed Himself to us is so important.

Amanda said...

I love your thoughts and appreciate you getting Truth out there. I will not read the Shack. I have no desire to and am quite happy honoring hte God of the Bible!

But anywho...

I am here because someone has nominated you for Awesome Blog 2009 Award!! Stop by and see what category someone thought you rocked!!

http://awesomestblogs2009.blogspot.com/

God bless-
Amanda

e-Mom said...

Faith: Thanks for your remarks. You raise an interesting (and valid) point: ...if a person needs to view God as a Mother due to issues from their past/with their own mother (or no mother) and I've met people like that, then I don't see the problem. Blessings!

Sheila: Thanks for "thinking" with me today. :~D I appreciate your perspective here: I take great joy in seeing the feminine characteristics of God... it reminds me that I too am made in His image and that my calling is not "less" because I'm female.

Somewhere on my bookhelf, I have a copy of Hind's Feet on High Places. I'll have to re-visit it! :~D

Kim: Thanks for sending some traffic my way today via Facebook! You're a sweetie. :~D

Jennifer: You're a wise Mom. This thought spoke to me: When she is older she can decide on her own whether or not it is worth her time but for now I don't want her reading false beliefs and not knowing what is right and what is wrong. Bless you in your parenting. Hugs!

Crickl: Thanks for stopping by today! Your wisdom as a pastor's wife is so evident in your remarks. I totally agree with you here: I think theology IS important, even in fiction. Stories, characters and worldviews get into your head. And here: There are a lot of these kinds of books out today trying to redefine how to relate to or view God. Careful study of God's true character and the way He's revealed Himself to us is so important. Love you!

Amanda: So nice to meet you! I'm honored to be nominated for your award. Blessings. :~D

Anonymous said...

Amen, Amen and Amen!! I am so glad to hear someone speaking on this book. My husband and I are definately a minority. We have researched and decided not to read it. Our pastor has spoken against it as well. The only book we really need is The Holy Bible!
Kim A.

Andrea said...

I've been going back and forth about whether or not to read The Shack, but I constantly encounter writings that mirror what this author has said.

Thanks for the interesting read!

Melanie said...

I found it to be a good read and also important to remember that it is fiction. With that being said, I think there is much good to be found in alot of it. I didn't have a problem with God being presented as a woman, although I do agree with some of the thoughts on that presented in this review. What this book did for me was to make me realize that I put God in a Box. I limit Him and God is "unlimitable".

Great discussion!

e-Mom said...

Kim A.: Thanks for stopping by. I appreciate your comment! :~D

Andrea: If you decide to read the book, come back and let me know what you thought. :~D

Melanie: Yes, fiction, and the writer's imagination truly are gifts. Fortunately, God has chosen to reveal Himself through the non-fiction pages of Scripture. Thanks for stopping by and joining the discussion! :~D

JulieM said...

Hi, I just read this post and agree wholeheartedly with it. My biggest problem with the book as a whole, besides the obvious doctrinal issues, is its insidiousness. It is disturbing to me that all those people who are "seekers" are being subjected to false doctrine and false hope! All roads do not lead to God -- only Jesus Christ is the Way, the Truth, and the Life.

Great post! I am new to your blog but look forward to keeping up with it. Thanks!
Julie

Connie Marie said...

It irked me to read of God as a big lady. I didn't like it. I still don't like it. The book was okay and I wrote about it at my blog too.

God is unimaginably perfect in all ways and cannot be brought down to our level in any way. We must always be in such awe of God! Like we learned at a recent conference, when a person sees God as the holy God that He is ... we will fall down on our faces.

God is not Santa, God is not Momma, and God is certainly not a big, humorous feminine being.

Susan said...

Great review E-mom. I've read many reviews that express the concerns.

I read it. Many parts deeply touched me, while I had some serious issues with others.

I strongly cautioned people when they told me they told me were going to read it.

On another note, are you on Facebook?

e-Mom said...

JulieM: So nice to meet you! Thanks for leaving a thoughtful comment today. :~D

Connie Marie: Wow, Amen to this: Like we learned at a recent conference, when a person sees God as the holy God that He is ... we will fall down on our faces.

Susan: I agree--I think it's wise to caution people about this book.

Your question: Yes, I did set up a Facebook account a few months ago, but I haven't had time to use it. Thanks for asking. Are you on Facebook?

Buffy said...

I haven't actually read the book although I probably will do because a lot of people at my church say it's good.

I don't really have a problem with God appearing in different genders as long as it is made clear he is neither one nor the other. Maybe it is our limited human thinking around what God is that is the problem. If The Shack causes people to even to think about theological issues that they've previously ignored then it sounds like a good thing. Of course, one would hope that the next step is to start reading the Bible!!!

e-Mom said...

BuffyAmen to this! Of course, one would hope that the next step is to start reading the Bible!!! Bless you!

 

Copyright © 2006-2011 C h r y s a l i s ღ. Design by Insight © 2009