"What shall we say the kingdom of God is like, or what parable shall we use to describe it? It is like a mustard seed, which is the smallest seed you plant in the ground. Yet when planted, it grows and becomes the largest of all garden plants, with such big branches that the birds of the air can perch in its shade."With many similar parables Jesus spoke the word to them, as much as they could understand. He did not say anything to them without using a parable. (Mark 4:30-34 NIV) Listen at BibleGateway.com.
How Salvation Came to Villages in Asia
Village literacy among this people group was found to be 0.08%. The Santal people [of South Asia] have no written history and do not rely on written documents for evidence or for credibility. They rely on what the elders have decided or what the elders say. A Christian outreach effort went to a Santal village and met Marandi, a man who had never been to school. They presented the gospel using oral methods, including stories, visual aids, dramas, songs, dances, and testimonies. Marandi trusted Christ and shared his testimony with his family, who also believed and were baptized. He then went to other relatives and shared his new faith with them, using many of the same oral methods. They also believed and were baptized. He then formed a team of believers, all oral communicators, who went to neighbouring villages using the same combination of stories, dramas, songs, etc. People in those villages accepted Christ, too. Those new believers formed their own teams and they went to yet other villages, still using the same basic strategies that had been introduced in the beginning. Many Santal people believed and they then formed their own outreach teams. The movement continues today among the Santal people.
This story is quoted is from the chapter, “Reproducibility, Reproducibility, Reproducibility” in ION’s online book Making Disciples of Oral Learners.
Who Are The Oral Majority?
“Seventy percent of the world’s people today can’t, don’t, or won’t read…”—Avery Willis, International Orality Network (ION)
Nearly 2,000 years ago, Jesus and his band of disciples proclaimed a revolutionary message through stories, parables, and proverbs. Although few members of the early church could read or write, the message of the gospel took root, owing partly to its method of proclamation. Today, a number of mission leaders are calling for a return to Jesus' oral method of communicating. The majority of the world's people, they say, won't be reached any other way…
…nearly 90 percent of the world's Christian workers serve among auditory learners and often use inappropriate, literacy-based communication styles…
Since the printing of the Gutenberg Bible,… Western Christianity "has walked on literate feet," indirectly requiring literacy for evangelism and discipleship. Yet more than 4 billion of the world's people are oral learners. According to the 2004 Lausanne paper "Making Disciples of Oral Learners," nearly 90 percent of the world's Christian workers serve among auditory learners and often use inappropriate, literacy-based communication styles…
Outreach Methods for Oral Learners
Reaching the oral majority for Christ requires communicating in forms familiar to oral cultures, such as stories, proverbs, drama, songs, chants, and poetry… Morgan Jackson, international director of Hosanna/Faith Comes By Hearing (FCBH), affirms that, ideally, “orality never moves people away from literacy—it moves them to literacy.”
Reaching the oral majority for Christ requires communicating in forms familiar to oral cultures, such as stories, proverbs, drama, songs, chants, and poetry…Working with Wycliffe and national Bible societies, Jackson’s ministry records and distributes Scripture readings around the world. After hearing the Scriptures, many listeners immediately want to read the Bible themselves, Jackson says.
Scripture Listening Groups & The JESUS Film Project
Last year, FCBH joined the JESUS Film Project to test an outreach program in 28 languages. Following more than 4,000 showings of the JESUS film, local volunteers trained by FCBH led weekly Scripture-listening and discussion groups. The results surpassed all expectations. In Nigeria 10,000 people made decisions for Christ, and 7,900 joined listening groups. Six months later, 42 of the groups had become churches. “Before, when you showed the JESUS film in some places,” Jackson says, “people came to Christ, but you could come back six months later and nothing would exist.”It can take time to train cross-cultural workers in oral techniques, which require a greater appreciation for the concrete. Trans World Radio’s training courses contrast how oral and literate learners think.
“When we’re taught to read and write, one of our first lesions in literacy is categorizing shapes into circles, triangles, and squares,” media services officer Tom Tatlow says. “But an oral person would say, ‘That’s a wheel, a pie, or a box…’”
Following more than 4,000 showings of the JESUS film, local volunteers trained by FCBH led weekly Scripture-listening and discussion groups. The results surpassed all expectations.
While orality may make headlines in the West, its strategies aren’t novel for majority-world Christians, says Scott Moreau, editor of Evangelical Missions Quarterly and chair of Wheaton Graduate School’s intercultural studies department. Moreau points to the explosion of the church in Asia, Africa, and Latin America in the last 50 years.
“We might be reinventing a wheel that they’ve been using a long time,” he says. “But it’s exciting that we’re discovering for ourselves what’s going on and using it to the kingdom’s advantage.”
This excerpt is quoted from CT’s article, “Winning the Oral Majority” by Dawn Herzog Jewell. Click here to learn more about the newly formed International Orality Network (ION), a partnership of 22 mission agencies including the Southern Baptist Convention's International Mission Board (IMB), Youth With a Mission (YWAM), Trans World Radio, Campus Crusade for Christ, and Wycliffe Bible Translators.
Orality at Home—Biblical Relevancy in Postmodern Culture
Mark Galli interviewed Ben Witherington III, professor of New Testament at Asbury Seminary in Kentucky about his views on evangelical theology in Christianity Today. In his book, The Problem with Evangelical Theology: Testing the Exegetical Foundations of Calvinism, Dispensationalism, and Wesleyanism, Witherington makes a positive argument for how biblical interpretation should be done in an increasingly postmodern setting.
Q. In the book, your theological critique is made on the way to discussing a larger concern.
A. I think part of the problem is that we are still doing theology in an Enlightenment frame of mind, as if it were a string of ideas that we should logically link together, and once we’ve produced a nice logical circle, then we’re home free. The truth is that life is a lot messier than that, and the Bible is more about stories than the history of ideas that are embedded in the stories.
Q. Many would argue that while that may be true of the Old Testament books of history, the Gospels, or Acts of the Apostles, it’s not true of Paul—the didactic teacher par excellence.
A. That view of Paul is a travesty. It treats Paul’s letters as if they were theological treatises, which they certainly are not. Paul is operating out of his storied world. He is theologizing and ethicizing into particular situations. His letters are not an abstract collection of eternal principles that we can then link. He’s a pastor preaching, if you will, proclaiming, persuading his audiences on particular points. The question is: What was he theologizing out of? And the answer is: his storied world—in particular, the story of Jesus Christ. “I resolved to know nothing while I was with you,” he says to the Corinthians, “except Jesus Christ and him crucified.” These are not abstract ideas. He’s talking about historical events and their theological and ethical significance. So the root of the matter is story.
I think the oral dimension of the biblical world, very much connected to storytelling, is a crucial dimension and is a key to understanding the theology in those texts.
When Paul thinks about sin and the fall, he thinks about Adam. When he thinks about he law, he thinks about the story of Moses. When he thinks about faith, he thinks about the story of Abraham. And, obviously, when he thinks about salvation, he thinks about the story of Jesus. So these big-ticket theological ideas are grounded in stories…The Bible was not written in a text-oriented culture but for an oral culture. So these documents were meant to be heard. When you read them out loud in Greek, you notice alliteration and poetry and all kinds of things going on that are totally lost in translation. I think the oral dimension of the biblical world, very much connected to storytelling, is a crucial dimension and is a key to understanding the theology in those texts.
Q. Perhaps in a postmodern culture—where image and story are more important than text and didactic argument—the Bible is more relevant than ever.
A. Exactly. In the 21st century, we’re moving increasingly in a postmodern direction. We have a new opportunity to re-engage the biblical text, which is trying to present word pictures and stories to a world that wants not just answers to its questions, but also its imagination fired up. That’s what this visual dimension of the text does.
Do you consider yourself an oral learner? Are your children?
Photo Credits: bonbongirl, YEHUDACO, Kevin, GoBot, saimens, thejulietfiles (Flickr)
Bookmark This












9 Comments:
I'm actually a very visual learner, not auditory. But this way of reaching people is very important. I grew up in countries like Bangladesh where literacy is a problem. Projects like the Jesus Film are essential for reaching these people.
What a fabulous post. I think of centuries ago when oral tradition was so important, but I think literacy opens people up to a whole new world. There is a reason the Bible was WRITTEN down for people to READ! Read to themselves, read allowed...
Thanks again!
Thank you so much for this post. I have to say that I am currently learning better to hear things...I don't know if my brain is on overload when I read?
But I am also a visual learner. What I mean by that is although I have read the Gospel message many times - Christ crucified, but it really 'hit home' when I saw the movie "The Passion of Christ". That movie made it very clear to me HOW much He suffered for me...Not that I didn't appreciated His sacrifice before, it just made it more vivid, I guess...
This was all very interesting.
I don't really think I am an auditory learner, but I seek ways of sharing the Bible as stories & with pictures.
twiga: You grew up in Bangladesh? Wow. Thanks for stopping by.
kathleen marie: I agree. I'm so glad I know how to read, and can read the Bible for myself! One important point that this article makes is that “orality never moves people away from literacy—it moves them to literacy.” It's exciting that "after hearing the Scriptures, many listeners immediately want to read the Bible themselves." I assume they have a huge learning curve, but the desire to know the Truth is a strong motivator.
eph2810: Thanks for sharing. My understanding is that "Oral Learners" are concrete in their thinking and DO respond best to sights and sounds. "Visual Learners" are abstract thinkers and glean information from symbols on a page. Perhaps you're in the former category?
I tend NOT to like movies, and I much prefer books. I enjoy music, but I prefer to listen in small doses. :~)
leftcoastonlooker: As a teacher, I assume you've learned to be fairly diverse for the sake of your students.
As a teacher, I had to learn to approach lessons in ways that all of my students could grasp.
I also teach them the study skills that enhance their learning style.
I learn best by reading & straight lecture, so I'm pretty blessed to have ended up with a few classes made up of straight "let-me-read & lecture-to-me" students!
But with the Bible, if we're learning about something, we're going to DO it, if we can. The Potter? we're going to make "pottery."
Talking about grapes today? We'll eat grapes, or run out to the backyard & pick some, in season.
(no, I'm not going to serve wine to elementary kiddos)
leftcoastonlooker: Thanks for coming back and sharing! Your hands-on approach to teaching the Bible sounds wonderful. Do you teach at a Christian school?
Personally, I find Learning Style fascinating. I've applied a lot of the concepts raising my own children. I'm primarily a "reading & straight lecture" person too... although I do enjoy other types of learning environments. With this blog, for example, I try to include a little of everything... articles, quizes, checklists, video & sound. I hope to do more with the latter in the future.
Oooooooo, emom, I soooo enjoyed this post! See? Lots of excitement from me to you. I'm a visual learner, but I'm l e a r n i n g to be a better listener, hearer...with all the "noise" around us in this world of ours, sometimes it's so hard to HEAR!
I especially enjoyed the Galli/Witherington interview. It is so difficult for us in Western culture to understand contextually the nuances of "story" that were such an intrinsic part of our ancient brothers and sisters. Their frame of reference was sooo different from ours--neither of us can "help" our perspective, lol.
My husband and I have discussed on more than one occasion thoughts related to over the past 2000 years of history, what a TINY percentage of lives lived have had access to the written word, to Scripture. (I know that sentence is confusing...hope you can decipher its meaning :) ). In other words, I guess ONE point I'm making, when Scripture tells us Jesus was the Word made flesh, it's not just telling us He was "the Bible" made flesh (and I think most literal people consider the latter...).
robin: I'm totally with you on this: I'm a visual learner, but I'm l e a r n i n g to be a better listener, hearer...with all the "noise" around us in this world of ours, sometimes it's so hard to HEAR! My husband is the Oral Learner in our family. I've been observing his learning style for nearly 30 years, and sometimes I still scratch my head!
You've written some wonderful reflections on this piece, Robin. I can't begin to imagine not being able to read and write... especially the Scriptures. Your point about the Word being spoken and made flesh, versus the written Word/Bible made flesh is well taken. I've considered that myself... and no doubt this is confusing to other literate Western modern thinkers.
Thanks for stopping by!
Post a Comment